The Broken Bible: Picking Up The Extraterrestrial Pieces
APOCALYPTIC ACTION HORROR EPIC RELIGIOUS MYSTERY WAR SUSPENSE/THRILLER
17th Century or Earlier,Future,Across Centuries
John E Chitty
Submision Type
book
Logline
Possibly The Most Extensive Literary Work Exposing Extraterrestrial Intervention Concealed Within Biblical Scripture Ever Compiled!
Genre
Apocalyptic,Action,Horror,Epic,Religious,Mystery,War,Suspense/Thriller
Short Summary
How The Actual CREATION Was Physically Performed, In DETAIL!
Setting
Information not completed
Based on a True Story
Yes
Plot - Premise
Rebellion Against 'The One'
Plot - Other Elements
Philosophical Questions
Mature Audience Themes
Extreme Violence
Main Character Details
Name: God
Age: ????
Gender: Male
Role: Tempter
Key Traits: Masculine,Villainous,Aggressive,Confident,Religious,Blunt,Secretive,Sophisticated,Unapologetic,Leader,Badass,Complex,Decisive,Engaging
Additional Character Details
The author has not yet written this
Additional Character Details
The author has not yet written this
Additional Character Details
The author has not yet written this
Genre
RELIGION
Brief
The author mixes science and verses from the Bible to explain elements as extraterrestrial life, Big Ben, and the creation of humanity.
Overall Rating
FAIR
Narrative Elements
Authors Writing Style: FAIR
Characterization: FAIR
Commerciality: FAIR
Franchise Potential: FAIR
Pace: FAIR
Premise: GOOD
Structure: FAIR
Theme: FAIR
Accuracy of Book Profile
It is accurate.
Draw of Story
The craziness. The author states theories that mix Bible teachings and verses with scientific discoveries. It all sounds crazy but somewhat intriguing.
Possible Drawbacks
It's too long. After some time, you stop caring about the bunch of details and citations.
Use of Special Effects
THE STORY RELIES HEAVILY ON SPECIAL EFFECTS
Primary Hook of Story
The hook is the idea that science can prove religion and vice versa.
Fanbase Potential
It depends. If the story is defined as fiction, I believe it could attract people. If it follows the idea that the author has evidence and can prove his theories, and take it seriously, I don't think so.
Awards Potential
No. It's based on unproven "evidence," and it could only have a chance if defined as fiction.
Envisioned Budget
LARGE BUDGET
Similar Films/TV Series
BATTLEFIELD EARTH: FILM WITH JOHN TRAVOLTA BASED ON SCIENTOLOGY'S BELIEFS. DE CARONA COM OS ÓVNIS: BRAZILIAN SERIES IN WHICH A MAN TRIES TO PROVE THAT ALIENS HAVE BEEN VISITING OUR PLANET.
What’s New About the Story
The author highly believes in his own theories. It's an extensive document that shows the author did a lot of research to complete the book.
Lead Characters
The main character is God. This fact itself is enough to make the lead stand out. The characters are ET's, angels, demons... in spite of these characters are not well developed, they are strong figures.
Uniqueness of Story
It's a rare gem because I've never read anything like this, it's original because the author did his own research, and apparently created his own evidence. However, it has the negative side of not being verified.
Possible Formats
Film - Indie, TV Series - Limited Run / Mini-Series, TV Series - Streaming, Unscripted
Analyst Recommendation
WORK IN PROGRESS
Justification
While the story has many positive points, it has room for improvement (see possible paths below). If you can't change the story at this point, my suggestion is using your notes as a guide to highlight the best aspects of it when taking the next steps, either putting a pitch page together, a treatment, or a presentation.
Tips for Improvement
This book should be adapted as a fiction story or a fake documentary. Another acceptable way could be a series that would show some religious and cults beliefs. It has a lot of material, it has generic but intriguing characters (as angels, demons, ET's, God), it follows a somewhat chronological structure, and it has interesting plots that could work well if the producer chooses the fiction side. It also could become a fake doc, with the author as the main figure (as a researcher) who presents his evidence and ideas. Also, it could be part of a documentary that shows how some religious people and cults strongly believe in things science cannot prove. Despite its craziness, it has some ways to go, but the problem is: the author totally believes in his theories, so would he accept to have his book turned into a mockumentary? Would he accept be presented as a fanatic who believes in not verified evidence? I don't think so.